Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 75(6): 1205-8, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17172394

RESUMO

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) allow for the testing of large numbers of samples within a short time frame. We tested the sensitivity and specificity of a histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based, commercially available ELISA antigen detection assay for Plasmodium falciparum (Malaria Antigen CELISA; Cellabs, Sydney, Australia). A total of 700 whole blood samples obtained from symptomatic outpatients of malaria clinics along the Thai-Myanmar border were tested relative to blinded duplicate expert microscopy adjusted with species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR-adjusted microscopy showed that 79 (11.3%) were infected with P. falciparum, 118 (16.9%) with P. vivax, 1 (0.1%) with P. malariae, 7 (1.0%) with mixed infections (P. falciparum and P. vivax), and 495 (70.7%) were negative. The geometric mean parasite density for P. falciparum was 7547/muL (range: 12-363,810/muL). The overall sensitivity of the HRP2 ELISA for P. falciparum malaria was 98.8% (95% CI, 93.6-100%) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI, 99.5-100%). The positive and negative predictive values for the ELISA were 100% (95% CI, 96.5-100%) and 99.8% (95% CI, 99.1-100%), respectively. The results for P. falciparum were clearly superior to expert microscopy alone, particularly in mixed infections. Microscopy combined with ELISA reaches a sensitivity and specificity similar to PCR-adjusted microscopy for the diagnosis of P. falciparum while being considerably less expensive and faster. We conclude that ELISA serves as an excellent tool to augment microscopy as the gold standard for P. falciparum diagnosis in research settings and should be further evaluated for screening in blood banks.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Protozoários/análise , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Malária Falciparum/diagnóstico , Adulto , Animais , Humanos , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Plasmodium falciparum/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tailândia
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 73(5): 842-9, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16282291

RESUMO

We assessed the prophylactic efficacy of azithromycin (250 mg/day) against malaria in 276 adults in western Thailand in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. After antimalarial suppressive treatment, volunteers were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either the azithromycin or placebo, respectively. Study medication was given for an average of 74 days. The azithromycin group (n = 179) had five endpoint parasitemias (1 Plasmodium vivax and 4 P. falciparum), and the placebo group (n = 97) had 28 endpoint parasitemias (21 P. vivax, 5 P. falciparum, and 2 mixed infections). Adverse events and compliance and withdrawal rates were similar in both groups. The protective efficacy (PE) of azithromycin was 98% for P. vivax (95% confidence interval [CI] = 88-100%). There were too few cases to reliably estimate the efficacy of azithromycin for P. falciparum (PE =71%, 95% C =-14-94%). We conclude that daily azithromycin was safe, well-tolerated, and had a high efficacy for the prevention of P. vivax malaria.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Malária Vivax/prevenção & controle , Parasitemia/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Animais , Antimaláricos/administração & dosagem , Azitromicina/administração & dosagem , Quimioprevenção , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Malária Vivax/epidemiologia , Malária Vivax/parasitologia , Masculino , Parasitemia/epidemiologia , Parasitemia/parasitologia , Plasmodium vivax/efeitos dos fármacos , Tailândia/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 70(1): 8-14, 2004 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14971691

RESUMO

This study examines hematologic profiles of persons with acute Plasmodium falciparum or P. vivax infection in Maesod on Thailand's western border with Myanmar compared with febrile, non-parasitemic persons also reporting to malaria clinics. Nine hundred seventy-nine subjects were malaria-negative, 414 were infected with P. falciparum, and 646 were infected with P. vivax. Persons with patent parasitemia tended to have significantly lower white blood cell, red blood cell, platelet, and hemoglobin levels than those who were malaria-negative. For the first time, a parallel trend in thrombocytopenia with parasitemia was found to be associated with both P. falciparum, and P. vivax infection. Using logistic regression, persons with platelet counts < 150,000/microL were 12-15 times more likely to have malaria than persons with platelet counts > or = 150,000/microL. This study supplements previous literature on the hematologic effects of malaria and helps define those alterations for a semi-immune population. Thrombocytopenia is identified as a key indicator of malaria in these febrile patients.


Assuntos
Malária Falciparum/sangue , Malária Vivax/sangue , Plasmodium falciparum/isolamento & purificação , Plasmodium vivax/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Contagem de Eritrócitos , Feminino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mianmar/etnologia , Parasitemia/sangue , Contagem de Plaquetas , Análise de Regressão , Tailândia
4.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 69(1): 26-30, 2003 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12932092

RESUMO

The NOW ICT Malaria P.f./P.v. for Whole Blood (Binax, Inc., Portland, ME) is a new malaria rapid diagnostic device that represents a technical advance over previous assays, such as ICT Malaria P.f./P.v. and ICT Malaria P.f.. We evaluated this device in March 2001 in symptomatic patients at malaria clinics in Maesod, Thailand. Microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood smears was the reference standard. In 246 patients, microscopy showed 32 (13.0%) infected with Plasmodium falciparum, 63 (25.6%) with P. vivax, 6 (2.4%) with mixed infections of P. falciparum and P. vivax, 5 (2.0%) with P. malariae, and 140 (56.9%) negative. Sensitivity for P. falciparum was 100% and specificity was 96.2% (200 of 208; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 92-98). For P. vivax, sensitivity was 87.3% (55 of 63; 95% CI = 77-93) and specificity was 97.7% (173 of 177; 95% CI = 95-99), but all the four false-positive results were microscopically positive for P. malariae; thus, specificity for non-falciparum Plasmodium was 100%. These results suggest improved performance over NOW ICT predecessors.


Assuntos
Imunoensaio/instrumentação , Imunoensaio/métodos , Malária Falciparum/diagnóstico , Malária Falciparum/imunologia , Plasmodium falciparum/isolamento & purificação , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Adulto , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Malária Vivax/diagnóstico , Malária Vivax/imunologia , Masculino , Parasitemia/diagnóstico , Parasitemia/imunologia , Plasmodium falciparum/imunologia , Plasmodium vivax/imunologia , Plasmodium vivax/isolamento & purificação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tailândia
5.
Acta Trop ; 82(1): 51-9, 2002 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11904103

RESUMO

In Myanmar, we tested two rapid malaria immunochromatographic kits: the OptiMAL assay for the detection of parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), and the ICT Malaria P.f./P.v. test for histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) and panmalarial antigens. A total of 229 patients were examined, of whom 133 were found to be malaria positive by Giemsa microscopy. Both OptiMAL and ICT gave lower sensitivities than previously reported. ICT sensitivity for Plasmodium falciparum and non-falciparum parasites were 86.2 and 2.9%, respectively; specificity was 76.9 and 100%, respectively. OptiMAL sensitivity for P. falciparum and non-falciparum parasites were 42.6 and 47.1%, respectively; specificity was 97.0 and 96.9%, respectively. The sensitivity of both tests for the detection of both P. falciparum and non-falciparum parasites increased with parasite density. Several explanations for these results are explored. Our results raise particular concern over batch quality variations of malaria rapid diagnostic devices (MRDDs).


Assuntos
Malária/diagnóstico , Plasmodium/química , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Animais , Antígenos de Protozoários/sangue , Corantes Azur , Cromatografia , Humanos , L-Lactato Desidrogenase/análise , Malária/sangue , Microscopia , Plasmodium/isolamento & purificação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Proteínas de Protozoários/sangue , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA